Sunday, June 19, 2016

U.S. School Bans Some Of Students’ Favorite Items Because It Offends Muslims




Eliminating ANYTHING from our culture because it offends Muslims is sheer dhimmitude by those who are either cowardly, uninformed or intellectually challenged.
The educational environment should  never have ethnic, religious, racial or political overtones. If it does, it is no longer education. It is blatant indoctrination.

 Sneaking Sharia law has entered U.S. schools by way of banning un-Islamic foods. What’s next? The removing crucifixes and forcing female students to cover their hair?

In the wake of Islamic terrorist attacks throughout the West, strong leaders in countries like Poland and Sweden have begun implementing measures to ensure Muslims either integrate or vacate. However, a U.S. school district has decided that its students need to give up some of their favorite things, in accordance with Sharia law, in order to make offended Muslims feel more at home.

Sweden announced in January that it will expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers over the next few years who crossed its borders illegally. Likewise, after the Brussels terrorist attack, Poland has boldly announced that it will no longer accept the 7,000 Muslim refugees it promised the UN it would welcome. Fortunately, America hasn’t suffered the same devastating effects of mass Islamic migration — unfortunately, that’s why she is still viewing tolerance as a one-way street when it comes to Muslims’ demands.

According to ACT For America, the Kent School District in Washington has announced it will no longer provide non-Muslim students with pork products or anti-Islamic food options during lunchtime, simply because its Muslim students are required by their religion to never ingest it.

When angry parent Dave Brabo heard about the district’s new policy to comply with Sharia and offer Islam-approved foods, he was livid. He called school officials, who only attempted to justify this bias treatment by saying that if they don’t “accommodate the Muslim dietary needs that their federal and state funding would be cut or pulled.”

Outraged that only Muslims’ religion would be favored, forcing everyone to change for their religious requirements, Brado demanded equal treatment for the school’s other religious groups.

Mr. Brabo responded by saying, “I want Kosher food added and labeled, Christian food offered during Lent, and even Hindi food offered.” According to Mr. Brabo, Tom Ogg, Director of Nutritional Services laughed and said, “No.”

Ironically, Brabo was told that the changes were made for physical or cognitive “documented disabilities” and that it had nothing to do with “religious exceptions.” Yet, religious exceptions were exactly what was promoted when the district complied with Islam’s requirement to refrain from consuming pork — a rule that solely applies to the followers of Islam, and not the majority of non-Muslim students.

Bare Naked Islam adds that Ogg, the school’s principal, and two other nutritional service employees told Brabo to “drop it,” and that they were “fearful of reprisal from the School District Administration and that funding would be cut if we didn’t fall in line.”

The district’s final admission to complying and “falling in line” or being punished is a prime example of how Sharia rises in non-Muslim countries. As the Muslim population grows, the democratic process is flipped upside down to reveal that the minority rules.


Sharia implementation begins with seemingly small demands, like the removal of pork products, requiring separate prayer rooms and breaks, or allowance of the hijab, niqab, and burka on public property. This soon escalates to legal prosecution of those who criticize Islam, terror attacks against the religious majority, and legislation that forces all others to adhere to Islamic laws and customs.


Until Muhammad drew his sword to behead 1,400 years ago, there was never a Muslim country, nor a Sharia governance. Because of Islamic persecution, migration, and terror, there are now over 50 countries that exact brutal Sharia legislation. Each one of them was either fooled into believing Muslims came peacefully with the intention of integrating, or they were forced into submission by conquest.

As Western countries begin bowing to the requirements meant only for Muslims, we again see the process of religious migration and subjugation taking over the last beacons of a free world — all beginning with our willingness to change our diet simply because of their dietary restrictions.

About Dom the Conservative (1406 Articles)

Dom is a conservative Christian who specializes in Middle Eastern affairs, Islamic immigration (hijra), Christianity, Islam, and Sharia law. She hopes to expose Islam as a fundamentally violent, political and religious ideology that seeks to use freedom and democracy to destroy freedom and democracy.

Source: Mad World News

1 comment: